News: Appraisal & Consulting

The creation of specific standards for evaluations - by Steven Spangle

Steven Spangle

On August 1, The Appraisal Standards Board, an independent board of The Appraisal Foundation, announced it intends to consider the creation of specific standards for evaluations.

An evaluation is a tool, other than an appraisal, for determining the market value of a commercial or residential property. 

FDIC regulations,  www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/5000-4900.html, address when an evaluation can be used, who can perform an evaluation, and what information must be in the evaluation. There is no requirement that the preparer have any appraisal knowledge, experience or specific competence, potentially putting institutions and consumers at risk. However, at a minimum the preparer must be independent and unbiased. There is no requirement that a qualified appraiser be used.

An institution can use an evaluation if a property has a transactional value (amount of a loan) is below the de minimis of $250,000 for residential and $500,000 for commercial properties. Evaluations may also be used for existing extension of credit, provided: there no obvious and material conditions or physical aspects threaten the institutions real estate collateral. There is no advance of new money other than funds necessary to cover reasonable closing costs.

There must be requirements for who the institution will use and who will review the reports.

The evaluations must not simply support the loan decision they must also promote safe and sound lending decisions.

The FDIC web site provides an example of a report type that is not acceptable:

“A valuation method that provides sales or listing price, such as a brokers price opinion (BPO), cannot be used since it does not provide a properties market value.”

An evaluation must include: the name, contact information of the individual preparing the evaluation. It must identify the property location and provide a description of the property and the current and projected use. Provide a description of the property and its current and projected use. 

Provide an estimate of the property’s market value in its actual physical condition, use and zoning designation as of the effective date of the evaluation (that is, the date that the analysis was completed), with any limiting conditions. Describe the method(s) the institution used to confirm the property’s actual physical condition and the extent to which an inspection was performed. Describe the analysis that was performed and the supporting information that was used in valuing the property. Describe the supplemental information that was considered when using an analytical method or technological tool. 

Indicate all source(s) of information used in the analysis, as applicable, to value the property, including: 

• External data sources (such as market sales databases and public tax and land records); 

• Property-specific data (such as previous sales data for the subject property, tax assessment data, and comparable sales information); 

• Evidence of a property inspection; •

 Photos of the property;  Description of the neighborhood; or 

• Local market conditions. 

These requirements are not that dissimilar from an appraisal and do not prevent an appraiser from accepting the assignment provided they augment these guidelines to make them conform with existing appraisal requirements. When hiring an appraiser to provide an opinion of market value there is the expectation of compliance with the appropriate appraisal standards. Qualified appraisers may not seek or accept evaluation assignments due to concerns over liability or over fee levels.

The ASB is planning on issuing a concept paper on potential standards for evaluation followed by a public hearing with panels of constituents on October 18, 2019, in Washington DC. It will be broadcast live via livestream. Appraisers and lenders with an interest should check The Appraisal Foundation website for more information. Everyone’s opinion is important and will contribute to the best resolution.

Steven Spangle, SRA, MRA, is president of Spangle Associates, Auburn, Mass.

MORE FROM Appraisal & Consulting
Appraisal & Consulting

From Heck NO to OK, Maybe! - by Jim O'Connell

Good bye 2023, we hardly knew ye! But we’re thrilled that you’re gone! Welcome 2024! Come, let us do some business! Skyrocketing interest rate increases caused a panic in the financial markets during the beginning of the year. With banks leading the way, everyone involved with real estate transactions headed for the exits!
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
It’s a confusing real estate world: Don’t you think? - by Daniel Calano

It’s a confusing real estate world: Don’t you think? - by Daniel Calano

The news is full of “never before” pronouncements. Never before has there been a pandemic so impactful on real estate. Never before has technology allowed for remote business meetings on such a frequent basis. Never before would people so comfortably work from home as to vacate office buildings, at least on Fridays and Mondays.
Tariffs: Existential threat, or serious real estate impacts - by Daniel Calano

Tariffs: Existential threat, or serious real estate impacts - by Daniel Calano

You must know from all the news, that “Trump tariffs” have been recently reviewed, discussed, evaluated, and as promised, implemented swiftly. But, they have also been modified, reduced or increased, just as fast and somewhat quixotically.
 Real estate without good estate planning - a troublesome problem - by Daniel Calano

Real estate without good estate planning - a troublesome problem - by Daniel Calano

I spent the better part of a day this week working with attorneys on estate planning. I am clearly not an attorney, but I have learned much over the years while consulting on real estate, its potential, its future during the life of clients, as well as, shall we say, later.