News: Retail

Mass. new access permit regulations to streamline process: Focal points and variable requirements

"We're from the government and we are here to help you." This has become a comic phrase in our society, but within the new regulations to the Mass. Highway Department's access permit procedures, it may actually be true. Art Scarneo is senior vice president of Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. (GPI), and branch manager of the Nashua, N.H. office. His office has created numerous traffic studies, access applications, and road designs in Mass. According to Scarneo, "One of the goals of the new regulations was to make the access application process more 'applicant friendly' by decreasing the department review time periods." The new regulations, which were effective in November, seem to have addressed that goal. Another goal was to make the process more consistent with the Mass. Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) process. In the past, the two codes had conflicting directives on what constituted a development project with significant traffic impacts. "Now the milestone items in the two codes are consistent," said Scarneo. The access regulations were last revised in 1991 with certain time frames included for both review and amendment. For sixteen years, the revisions and most of the review times were ignored. While cost and degree of difficulty are certainly major concerns to access applicants, the "black hole" of review time is of greater concern. The new regulations now include a 10-day period to deem an application complete and a 20 to25 day technical response period in each of the design submission stages. "Time will tell whether application load and staffing will permit the department to keep to these time frames. If they do, the onus will be on the applicant to quickly respond to review comments and to submit successive stages," Scarneo said. GPI was fully involved in the public review participation portion of the regulations. "We responded to the department's requests for written comments and attended the public conference sessions." This provided GPI an opportunity to be fully aware of the criteria in the new regulations when they became effective. The new regulations have other focal points to standardize and streamline the access application review process. They include: * Two types of permits for vehicular and non-vehicular access. * Three distinct categories for vehicular access. (minor, major, complex). *A design exception report requirement. The last of these is a new concept for private development mitigation on state highways. Under the previous regulations, private projects were only required to meet department criteria to the greatest extent practicable. Now, if a private mitigation project does not completely meet the minimum design standards of the department, a design exception report may be required. This report must detail, at length, the reasons why the proposed design does not meet the criteria and why approval of that design will not affect the health, safety, or welfare of the public. An analogy would be a zoning code variance request. Certain projects may be exempt from this requirement if they are limited in scope. A major change in the new access regulations is the definition of substantial increase or impact on traffic. If a private development abuts a state highway and proposes changes to that development, then an access permit need only be filed if one of these thresholds are exceeded: * Generation of 2,000, or more, new trips * Generation of 1,000, or more, new trips and 150, or more, new parking spaces * Construction of 300, or more, new parking spaces * Creation of a change in the type, pattern, or timing of traffic. This last item is open to the interpretation of the Department. While the major design criteria for the access permit regulations have not changed, these cataloging and processing changes may indeed prove to be the government actually assisting the applicants. For more detailed information on the new access permit regulations, or to discuss a specific project situation, Scarneo can be reached at Greenman-Pedersen, Inc., in Nashua at (603) 891-2213 or by e-mail at AScarneo@gpinet.com. Bill Beardslee, SE, PLS, PP is director of engineering at Beardslee Engineering, Sparta, N.J.
Tags: Retail
MORE FROM Retail
Retail

The Landing at Hyannis expands with additional retailers

Hyannis, MA The Landing at Hyannis continues its transformation with three new businesses joining its roster of retail and dining options. These brands, making their debut on Cape Cod, include fashion retailer Nordstrom Rack, physician-owned medical spa SkinMD, and eyewear retailer Warby Parker.

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Village centers and local retail: What the market wants - by Carol Todreas

Village centers and local retail: What the market wants - by Carol Todreas

Good news! Brick and mortar is alive and well. Many malls are coming back. Americans are flocking to Europe to walk, shop, eat, and enjoy much needed vacations. Visitors return and talk about the pleasures of walking and shopping in local shops in cities and towns all over Europe.
Keeping the “there” there - by Carol Todreas

Keeping the “there” there - by Carol Todreas

New zoning is a big topic for many communities. Whether it is to comply with the 2021 MBTA legislation calling for more multi-family housing in locales with access to T stations or to address other pressures from public-private entities, zoning for multi-family housing is believed to be a major part of the solution to the housing crisis.
Reimagining retail for the downtown - by Carol Todreas

Reimagining retail for the downtown - by Carol Todreas

Before COVID-19, downtown retail had been sliding downwards. A few restaurants and stores were hanging on, but the trajectory was headed south. Now with post- COVID-19 lifestyle changes, old-style retail anywhere has lost its market appeal.
Placemaking and retail in 2024 - by Carol Todreas

Placemaking and retail in 2024 - by Carol Todreas

Placemaking. That is the word for 2024. While the concept has historical precedence in urban development, it became part of our current culture in the 1960’s when urbanists started to think about cities for people, not just cars.