News: Front Section

Discharge of indebtedness excluded from taxable income

Many taxpayers acquired their residences with highly leveraged mortgages during inflationary periods in the housing market. The belief was that as housing prices continued to escalate, home owners would be able to create equity through mortgage amortization, coupled with appreciation in their residences. However, when the housing market began to decline, these same taxpayers found that their mortgage debt exceeded the fair market value of the home. Based on the lender, taxpayers faced either foreclosure on the property or renegotiated the outstanding balance of the debt downward to reflect the current value of the property. In either case, Internal Revenue Code Section 61 requires that income from the discharge of indebtedness be included in gross income unless it is excludable under Code Section 108. The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007, (which will become law after it receives Presidential approval) includes a relief provision that applies to taxpayers, other than those covered by Code Section 108. This relief would apply to solvent taxpayers who have realized taxable income as a result of a full or partial discharge of qualified principal residence indebtedness. Under the bill, instead of recognizing income, the discharged indebtedness income would be deducted from the taxpayer's basis in the residence. The amount subject to this adjustment would be limited to the taxpayer's acquisition indebtedness, defined as debt incurred in the acquisition, construction, or substantial improvement of the principal residence and secured by the residence. Any amounts forgiven, in excess of the acquisition indebtedness, would still be taxable under Code Section 61. The intent of this bill is to eliminate the tax liability on these restructurings or foreclosures, which will assist the taxpayer in re-establishing his financial position without suffering a tax on phantom income from this discharged indebtedness. Norman Posner, CPA, managing partner, Samet & Co., Chestnut Hill, Mass. Ron Mutascio, CPA, MST, also with Samet, contributed to this article.
MORE FROM Front Section

Newmark negotiates sale of 10 Liberty Sq. and 12 Post Office Sq.

Boston, MA Newmark has completed the sale of 10 Liberty Sq. and 12 Post Office Sq. Newmark co-head of U.S. Capital Markets Robert Griffin and Boston Capital Markets executive vice chairman Edward Maher, vice chairman Matthew Pullen, executive managing director James Tribble,
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Four tips for a smooth 1031 Exchange - by Bill Lopriore

Four tips for a smooth 1031 Exchange - by Bill Lopriore

Many real estate investors do not understand the specific requirements that must be met to secure the benefits of a tax-deferred 1031 exchange. For example, the replacement property must be identified within 45 days of the closing date of the relinquished property.
Five ways to ruin a  Section 1031  Like-Kind Exchange - by Bill Lopriore

Five ways to ruin a Section 1031 Like-Kind Exchange - by Bill Lopriore

While there is some flexibility when structuring a like-kind exchange, some important requirements must be met. A mistake can ruin your exchange. Here are five mistakes to avoid:
Make PR pop by highlighting unique angles - by Stanley Hurwitz

Make PR pop by highlighting unique angles - by Stanley Hurwitz

Coming out of the pandemic, a client with three hotels in Provincetown, Mass., needed ways to let the world know his properties were open for business for the 2021 tourist season.
How COVID-19 has impacted office leasing - by Noble Allen and John Sokul

How COVID-19 has impacted office leasing - by Noble Allen and John Sokul

To say that the effects of COVID-19 has transformed office leasing is an understatement. When COVID-19 was at its peak, office spaces were practically abandoned either through governmental mandates or through actions taken by businesses themselves.