News: Front Section

Real estate tax abatements - a step-by-step overview for the Mass. property owner - by Saul Feldman

Saul Feldman, Feldman Law Office Saul Feldman, Feldman Law Office

In Massachusetts, the fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. The tax date is the preceding January 1. We are now in fiscal 2016. The fiscal year began on July 1, 2015, and it will end on June 30, 2016. The tax date was January 1, 2015. This means that the fair cash value of the property on January 1, 2015, is the standard that the local assessors must meet. In the event a property owner believes that the assessors have failed to meet this standard, the property owner should file an application for abatement with the local board of assessors. In most cities and towns, the deadline for filing is the beginning of February. I would advise any property owner of residential or commercial property who believes his property has been over valued to file. There is no filing fee. You do not need a lawyer in order to file.

A taxpayer must file a separate application for abatement with the local assessors each year. Even though you filed for fiscal 2015, you still have to file an application for fiscal 2016 if you want to be able to obtain an abatement for fiscal 2016 as well as for fiscal 2015.

A taxpayer initially should file an application for abatement with the Board of Assessors. A taxpayer not happy with the Board of Assessors’ refusal to grant a tax abatement on a parcel of real estate may take an appeal to the Appellate Tax Board (ATB).

However, pursuant to Section 64 of Chapter 59 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the petition must be filed within three (3) months after the date of the decision of the Board of Assessors or within three (3) months after the date the application is deemed denied.

Whenever the Board of Assessors fails to act within three (3) months from the date of filing the application for abatement, the application shall be deemed to be denied.

Often a property owner who has a good case for an abatement fails to file the appeal on time. The time requirements are jurisdictional. Failure to comply with the time requirements will mean that the ATB must dismiss the appeal.

Most applications for abatement are filed by February 1. Quite often, the Board of Assessors issues a denial in March. Therefore, April, May, and June are the months when many appeals are filed with the ATB.

It is obviously very unfortunate if a property owner is prevented from getting tax relief because he failed to appeal to the ATB on time.

Saul Feldman is a real estate attorney with Feldman Law Office, Boston, Mass.

MORE FROM Front Section

Newmark negotiates sale of 10 Liberty Sq. and 12 Post Office Sq.

Boston, MA Newmark has completed the sale of 10 Liberty Sq. and 12 Post Office Sq. Newmark co-head of U.S. Capital Markets Robert Griffin and Boston Capital Markets executive vice chairman Edward Maher, vice chairman Matthew Pullen, executive managing director James Tribble,
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Four tips for a smooth 1031 Exchange - by Bill Lopriore

Four tips for a smooth 1031 Exchange - by Bill Lopriore

Many real estate investors do not understand the specific requirements that must be met to secure the benefits of a tax-deferred 1031 exchange. For example, the replacement property must be identified within 45 days of the closing date of the relinquished property.
Make PR pop by highlighting unique angles - by Stanley Hurwitz

Make PR pop by highlighting unique angles - by Stanley Hurwitz

Coming out of the pandemic, a client with three hotels in Provincetown, Mass., needed ways to let the world know his properties were open for business for the 2021 tourist season.
Five ways to ruin a  Section 1031  Like-Kind Exchange - by Bill Lopriore

Five ways to ruin a Section 1031 Like-Kind Exchange - by Bill Lopriore

While there is some flexibility when structuring a like-kind exchange, some important requirements must be met. A mistake can ruin your exchange. Here are five mistakes to avoid:
How COVID-19 has impacted office leasing - by Noble Allen and John Sokul

How COVID-19 has impacted office leasing - by Noble Allen and John Sokul

To say that the effects of COVID-19 has transformed office leasing is an understatement. When COVID-19 was at its peak, office spaces were practically abandoned either through governmental mandates or through actions taken by businesses themselves.