News: Front Section

Potentially huge changes ahead for dividends and capital gains rates

Although the dog days of summer are here, many investors are already thinking about January 1st of next year. Why? Because if Washington does not take any action prior to that date, then the tax on capital gains, currently at 15%, could jump to 23.8% and the tax on dividends, currently at 15%, could jump to as high as 43.4%. That possibility has many investors considering whether they should take preemptive measures during the remainder of 2011. This enormous jump in capital gain and dividend rates would result from the combined effect of the so-called "Bush-era tax cuts" lapsing and the enactment of the Medicare contribution and payroll tax. If Washington does not take any action, then the Bush-era tax cuts will lapse resulting in a capital gain rate jump from 15% to 20% and a dividend rate jump from 15% to a possible high of 39.6%. The new healthcare law adds an additional 3.8% tax on both dividends and capital gains for certain taxpayers. The 3.8% tax is imposed on net investment income, which includes capital gains, dividends, annuities, rents, royalties and interest (except tax-exempt interest). The tax applies to single taxpayers with a modified adjusted gross income of $200,000 or more and joint filers with a modified adjusted gross income of $250,000 or more. The taxpayer is responsible for paying the tax. In addition, the new healthcare law increases the employee portion of the hospital insurance payroll tax by 0.9% for individuals with wages in excess of $200,000 and for joint filers with wages in excess of $250,000. This increase is only applicable to the employee's portion of hospital insurance, not the employer's portion of hospital insurance. An employee could get caught by surprise on this additional hospital insurance tax because the employer is only required to withhold the additional tax for employees who make more than $200,000. Consequently, if the employee and his or her spouse make more than $250,000, but neither spouse makes more than $200,000, then neither spouse's employer will have withheld any amount of this additional tax and the couple will need to pay the additional tax directly. Ultimately it is the taxpayer's responsibility to make sure the tax is paid. As year-end approaches, it would be a wise idea to contact your investment advisers to glean any guidance they may have for addressing the potential changes that 2013 may bring. John Varella is an attorney with Lourie & Cutler, Boston, Mass.
MORE FROM Front Section

Newmark negotiates sale of 10 Liberty Sq. and 12 Post Office Sq.

Boston, MA Newmark has completed the sale of 10 Liberty Sq. and 12 Post Office Sq. Newmark co-head of U.S. Capital Markets Robert Griffin and Boston Capital Markets executive vice chairman Edward Maher, vice chairman Matthew Pullen, executive managing director James Tribble,
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Quick Hits
Columns and Thought Leadership
Five ways to ruin a  Section 1031  Like-Kind Exchange - by Bill Lopriore

Five ways to ruin a Section 1031 Like-Kind Exchange - by Bill Lopriore

While there is some flexibility when structuring a like-kind exchange, some important requirements must be met. A mistake can ruin your exchange. Here are five mistakes to avoid:
Make PR pop by highlighting unique angles - by Stanley Hurwitz

Make PR pop by highlighting unique angles - by Stanley Hurwitz

Coming out of the pandemic, a client with three hotels in Provincetown, Mass., needed ways to let the world know his properties were open for business for the 2021 tourist season.
Four tips for a smooth 1031 Exchange - by Bill Lopriore

Four tips for a smooth 1031 Exchange - by Bill Lopriore

Many real estate investors do not understand the specific requirements that must be met to secure the benefits of a tax-deferred 1031 exchange. For example, the replacement property must be identified within 45 days of the closing date of the relinquished property.
How COVID-19 has impacted office leasing - by Noble Allen and John Sokul

How COVID-19 has impacted office leasing - by Noble Allen and John Sokul

To say that the effects of COVID-19 has transformed office leasing is an understatement. When COVID-19 was at its peak, office spaces were practically abandoned either through governmental mandates or through actions taken by businesses themselves.