News: Spotlights

Cash is king...or not? Landlords and tenants should consider the specifics of a lease transaction

Landlords and tenants rarely pass the letter of intent stage in any commercial lease negotiation without a thorough discussion about security for tenants' obligations under a lease. While landlords may be quick to demand cash security deposits from commercial tenants - the more cash the better - that conclusion may not always be in a landlord's best interest. Stand-by letters of credit provide a useful alternative under the right circumstances. Likewise, tenants should consider expanding negotiations to include discussion about letters of credit for their own reasons as well. As more leases provide for letters of credit as security, the law in this area continues to develop and additional factors must be considered. A landlord's primary motivation in seeking security under a lease agreement is to ensure payment in the event its tenant becomes insolvent. A default in tenant's obligations could impact the landlord's ability to meet its own obligations under a mortgage or otherwise. Unfortunately, insolvency laws, including bankruptcy, change the rules of the game and may delay, limit or altogether prohibit a landlord from actually taking cash held as a security deposit in satisfaction of a tenant's debt. The problem lies in the fact that a security deposit remains property of the tenant despite the fact it is paid over to and held by the landlord. As tenant's property, the security deposit is part of the bankruptcy estate and therefore subject to the automatic stay triggered by a tenant's bankruptcy. Without relief from the bankruptcy court, the landlord cannot use the tenant's funds. Even if the landlord has a perfected priority security interest in the tenant's security deposit, by virtue of its possession of the funds or otherwise, taking such funds without court approval could be deemed a violation of the automatic stay and subject the landlord to penalties. Furthermore, to the extent the landlord applied its tenant's security deposit prior to the tenant's bankruptcy, any funds collected in the ninety days prior to the bankruptcy filing could be recouped by a debtor in possession or bankruptcy trustee as preferential transfers. Alternatively, if the landlord had obtained a letter of credit in support of tenant's obligations under a lease, the landlord could present the letter of credit directly to the issuing bank, which would obligate the bank to pay the landlord's claim pursuant to the terms of the letter of credit. In general, amounts received by the landlord directly from the issuing bank are treated like payments received from a guarantor and may not be subject to any preferential transfer action or otherwise require a bankruptcy court's permission before receipt. Some courts are hesitant to allow this result where language in the lease requiring the letter of credit is not properly drafted or where the letter of credit is secured by tenant's cash. For instance, where a lease provides for the option to use either a letter of credit or security deposit, a bankruptcy court may find that the letter of credit is analogous to a security deposit and will treat it as such. Also, where a letter of credit is secured by a debtor's underlying cash collateral, a court may treat the letter of credit as cash and impose limitations such as those found under Section 502(b)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code. The First Circuit has not conclusively ruled on these issues yet, while other circuits have offered conflicting guidance; however, careful drafting of both the lease and letter of credit may increase the likelihood that a landlord may freely exercise its rights in the event of tenant's bankruptcy. Tenants may also see the benefit of a letter of credit where a landlord becomes insolvent and converts a tenant's security deposit for its own use in the absence of a default. Commercial landlords are generally allowed to comingle tenants' security deposits with their own funds. At any given time, tenant's security deposit could be subject to creditor attachment or a bank's perfected security interest, to the extent that the deposit is in landlord's general accounts. If the landlord's depository bank is also a secured creditor, the bank could simply reach into the landlord's operating account and take the funds without notice or demand to the tenant. Moreover, if the landlord files for bankruptcy protection, a tenant's claim for return of its security deposit would stand in line with other general unsecured creditors, absent expensive legal wrangling to prove a constructive trust or other priority claim to the funds. It may be possible to address some of these issues in a negotiated subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement between the tenant, the landlord and its bank, but a tenant could avoid landlord insolvency issues through use of a letter of credit. So long as the tenant is not in default under the lease, a properly drafted letter of credit should be outside the scope of any claims or liens asserted by landlord's creditors. The drafting and negotiation of a letter of credit adds transaction time and cost at the inception of a lease, but these costs may be offset by mitigating risk on both sides of the equation. A letter of credit may also cause a tenant to incur finance fees and interest expenses, but such costs are a function of the bank and the availability under any existing credit facility held by a tenant. An ancillary benefit to the landlord derived from discussing the possibility of a letter of intent is insight into the tenant's creditworthiness, that may or may not be apparent from financials and other disclosures obtained in the course of lease negotiations and due diligence. At the very least, both parties should consider the specifics of any particular lease transaction before settling on a cash security deposit over a letter of credit from a healthy bank. Michael Rosen, Esq. is a partner and Christopher Agostino, Esq. is an associate in the corporate and business law group at Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C., Boston, Mass.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
STAY INFORMED FOR $9.99/Mo.
NEREJ PRINT EDITION
Stay Informed
STAY CONNECTED
SIGN-UP FOR NEREJ EMAILS
Newsletter
Columns and Thought Leadership
Shawmut Design and Construction breaks ground on the 195 District Park Pavilion in Providence, RI

Shawmut Design and Construction breaks ground on the 195 District Park Pavilion in Providence, RI

Providence, RI Shawmut Design and Construction celebrated the ceremonial groundbreaking for the 195 District Park Pavilion, marking the start of construction on a facility that will feature year-round dining and support space for park operations. In addition to the 3,500 s/f building, the project will include infrastructure upgrades
The New England Real Estate Journal presents<br> the First Annual Project of the Year Award! Vote today!

The New England Real Estate Journal presents
the First Annual Project of the Year Award! Vote today!

The New England Real Estate proud to showcase the remarkable projects that have graced the cover and center spread of NEREJ this year, all made possible by the collaboration of outstanding project teams. Now, it's time to recognize the top project of 2024, and we need your vote!
Investing in a falling rate environment - by Harrison Klein

Investing in a falling rate environment - by Harrison Klein

Long-term interest rates have fallen by 100 basis points, and the market is normalizing. In December of 2022 I wrote an article about investing in a high interest rate, high inflation market. Since then, inflation has cooled off, and the Fed has begun lowering their funds rate.
The 2024 CRE markets: “The Ups” (industrial) and “The Downs” (Boston class B/C office) - by Webster Collins

The 2024 CRE markets: “The Ups” (industrial) and “The Downs” (Boston class B/C office) - by Webster Collins

The industrial markets have never been stronger. What has happened is that the build out of Devens with new high-tech biotech manufacturing with housing to service these buildings serves as the connector required to really make the I-495 West market sizzle. Worcester has been the beneficiary